> Dave,
>
> The browser side of my ISP is having problems, and I have not been able to
> look at your
> website. When you first used this term WP in the Gen 2:19 discussion, you
> adequately
> described the surface structure, so I know what you're talking about. But
> you did not state
> in that post what the letters "WP" stand for. Maybe that will help us
> understand your
> perception of this grammatical form.
WP == waw+prefix form. It's a morphological description that
doesn't inject any functional presuppositions. I adopted it from F. I.
Andersen, "The Sentence in Biblical Hebrew" (The Hague: Mouton,
1974).
Dave Washburn http://www.nyx.net/~dwashbur
A Bible that's falling apart means a life that isn't.