sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Unverified, volatile, non-summonable spell sources (example: libaccounts-glib)
- From: Ismael Luceno <ismael.luceno AT gmail.com>
- To: Treeve Jelbert <treeve AT scarlet.be>
- Cc: <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Unverified, volatile, non-summonable spell sources (example: libaccounts-glib)
- Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 13:58:08 -0300
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 11:12:43 +0200
Treeve Jelbert <treeve AT scarlet.be> wrote:
<...>
> in particular there seems to be no way to get a properly versioned
> tarball, so I resorted to ta minimal git checkout.
> This problem affects most of the spells in this section, some of
> which have a a lot of history which I did not want.
> In some cases the difference was ~300K vs ~15M.
> Also some of the spells have no official releases.
>
> Does 'summon' process the DOWNLOAD file?
Yes, it does.
> If so, I coud improve the clone_single_branch function, to give a
> reproducible result.
Please don't, instead extend the standard Git backend, it already
fetches a single branch, it just needs to know about --depth, by
extending the URL parser to specify the depth the change should be
minimal.
We should be able to make a new release of sorcery soon. I am hoping
to have a couple of days to work on it next weekend to clean up a few
features.
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Unverified, volatile, non-summonable spell sources (example: libaccounts-glib), Ismael Luceno, 08/02/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.