sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Ladislav Hagara <ladislav.hagara AT unob.cz>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc
- Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 06:29:06 +0100
> http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13873
> http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15559
I tested devel sorcery, seems works like a charm (installwatch part,
there is a problem with PAGER patch).
In devel-xorg-modular git branch I updated installwatch to 2010-12-12
and coreutils to 8.8. Please test on your test boxes. If you cast -c
e2fsprogs you should be able to see mkfs.extX by
$ gaze install e2fsprogs|grep mkfs
/sbin/mkfs.ext2
/sbin/mkfs.ext3
/sbin/mkfs.ext4
Of course you can inspect files created in /var/cache/sorcery, compare
with previous version created by previous sorcery and previous installwatch.
Happy New Year! :-)
--
Ladislav Hagara
-
[SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc,
Robert Figura, 12/01/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc,
George Sherwood, 12/01/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc,
Robert Figura, 12/04/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc,
Ladislav Hagara, 12/12/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc, Ladislav Hagara, 12/12/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc,
George Sherwood, 12/12/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc, Ladislav Hagara, 12/31/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc,
Ladislav Hagara, 12/12/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc,
Robert Figura, 12/04/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc,
George Sherwood, 12/01/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.