sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: George Sherwood <pilot AT beernabeer.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc
- Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 05:56:53 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 06:36:22 +0100
Robert Figura <rfigura AT aubergine.zwischengesicht.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> i recently tried a clean rebuild off the current 0.10.0 iso using test
> grimoire. I encountered something wich seems to be explained by this:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/552816
>
> In short: A recent in glibc update reveals a bug in coreutils which
> makes cp -p fail. As some spells (upstream installers) use cp -p and
> friends to install, this will at least cause install failures for
> db and python...
>
> Is there a reason why coreutils is still version 7.xx whilst the first
> of the 8.xx's is more than a year old?
>
Bug #13873 was found during a coreutils update long ago. I have been
running coreutils 8.6 and 8.7 for a month and a half now and I haven't
run into the issue yet. With the bug that you found, it sounds like it
is time to update coreutils. I will try to do it when I get back in
town this week if some one doesn't beat me to it.
George Sherwood
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkz2OAUACgkQkVJnfkgKg63zQQCfZ7JBojKH1aAFWNmJhGhD6eVU
MlAAnj2ZN7W93Wor9nPc5X7owTNAEQjH
=x/er
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc,
Robert Figura, 12/01/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc,
George Sherwood, 12/01/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc,
Robert Figura, 12/04/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc,
Ladislav Hagara, 12/12/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc, Ladislav Hagara, 12/12/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc,
George Sherwood, 12/12/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc, Ladislav Hagara, 12/31/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc,
Ladislav Hagara, 12/12/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc,
Robert Figura, 12/04/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc,
George Sherwood, 12/01/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.