Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] So we need linux-pam-headers?

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] So we need linux-pam-headers?
  • Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:19:18 -0700

Quoting Thomas Orgis <thomas-forum AT orgis.org>:

Yeah, $SUBJECT ...
I don't know how, but I stumbled over this spell through libcap failing.
It found headers from linux-pam-headers but not the PAM library... thus
broke the build.

No idea why I had linux-pam-headers cast anyway, but looking at this
spell really raises the question if it should (still) be there.
Deprecate?

IIRC, some packages (such as openoffice) can use the linux-pam-headers to build, for those whom don't want linux-pam itself installed and taking over their system.

-sandalle

--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | http://counter.li.org/ #196285





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page