sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Ladislav Hagara <ladislav.hagara AT unob.cz>
- To: Thomas Orgis <thomas-forum AT orgis.org>
- Cc: "sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org" <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] So we need linux-pam-headers?
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:19:00 +0200
Yeah, $SUBJECT ...
I don't know how, but I stumbled over this spell through libcap failing.
It found headers from linux-pam-headers but not the PAM library... thus
broke the build.
No idea why I had linux-pam-headers cast anyway, but looking at this
spell really raises the question if it should (still) be there.
Deprecate?
I think remove.
Seems only openoffice spell depends on it (LINUX-PAM-HEADERS) and it is probably from openoffice 1.0.1 (http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/hints/files/OpenOfficeFromScratch/).
--
Ladislav Hagara
-
[SM-Discuss] So we need linux-pam-headers?,
Thomas Orgis, 06/16/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] So we need linux-pam-headers?, Ladislav Hagara, 06/16/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] So we need linux-pam-headers?, Eric Sandall, 06/16/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.