sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

[SM-Discuss] So we need linux-pam-headers?

From: Thomas Orgis <thomas-forum AT orgis.org>
To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: [SM-Discuss] So we need linux-pam-headers?
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 23:44:29 +0200

Yeah, $SUBJECT ...
I don't know how, but I stumbled over this spell through libcap failing.
It found headers from linux-pam-headers but not the PAM library... thus
broke the build.

No idea why I had linux-pam-headers cast anyway, but looking at this
spell really raises the question if it should (still) be there.
Deprecate?

Alrighty then,

Thomas.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

[SM-Discuss] So we need linux-pam-headers?, Thomas Orgis, 06/16/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] So we need linux-pam-headers?, Ladislav Hagara, 06/16/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] So we need linux-pam-headers?, Eric Sandall, 06/16/2008