sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
[SM-Discuss] mandatory / automatic source verification
- From: Thomas Orgis <thomas-forum AT orgis.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] mandatory / automatic source verification
- Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 14:43:43 +0200
Hi again...
just a note about our source verification: I just updated the mksh spell
which has a special source archive format (cpio.gz) which we don't have a
handler for.
The spell creator made a PRE_BUILD that contains the line to unpack the
archive... it was missing default_pre_build, and thus missing any source
verification!
That rang a little, but loud, bell inside my head: Shouldn't source
verification be a mandatory step _before_ PRE_BUILD?
Of course the best solution for this specific problem would be to add cpio.gz
unpacking to sorcery, but the general question remains if it should be that
easy to (accidentally) circumvent the source authenticity checks.
Again, opinions?
Alrighty then,
Thomas.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] mandatory / automatic source verification,
Thomas Orgis, 06/02/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mandatory / automatic source verification,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 06/02/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mandatory / automatic source verification,
Thomas Orgis, 06/02/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mandatory / automatic source verification,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 06/02/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] mandatory / automatic source verification, Remko van der Vossen, 06/02/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mandatory / automatic source verification,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 06/02/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mandatory / automatic source verification,
Thomas Orgis, 06/02/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mandatory / automatic source verification,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 06/02/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.