sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Andraž \"ruskie\" Levstik" <ruskie AT mages.ath.cx>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] spell file inheritance
- Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:01:39 +0200
Juuso Alasuutari wrote :
> I guess this pretty much seals the discussion about what criteria to use
> for
> grouping spells into sections, eh? Code inheritance seems to be the most
> rational choice. Or has there been any disagreement about this lately?
>
> On Sunday 02 July 2006 03:24, Andrew Stitt wrote:
> > Im working on bug 10914 and theres some additional spell api's that need
> > to get created for it. I'd like to run this past the grimoire gurus in
> > case theres something I missed, and to let everyone know whats going on.
> <snip>
>
This has been the norm most of the time. Code reuse. There's really nut much
one can do with arbitrary groups. As was pointed out by some.
--
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru
Geek/Hacker/Tinker
Hacker FAQ: http://www.plethora.net/%7eseebs/faqs/hacker.html
Be sure brain is in gear before engaging mouth.
Key id = A7A9E461
Key fingerprint = 757E C16B F5B7 DC27 B003 CCED CF95 3A77 A7A9 E461
-
[SM-Discuss] spell file inheritance,
Andrew Stitt, 07/01/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] spell file inheritance,
seth, 07/03/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] spell file inheritance, Andrew Stitt, 07/03/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] spell file inheritance,
Juuso Alasuutari, 07/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] spell file inheritance, Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 07/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] spell file inheritance,
seth, 07/03/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.