sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?
- From: "Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:26:54 -0500
On Apr 25, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) [jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org] wrote:
> The spells we started out talking about (things with a fine license which
> require "some java interpreter") are not rejectable by any terms I'm aware
> of this distro accepting.
Self-reply for honesty's sake, the relevant sentence of SC 1 says:
"We will support our users who develop and run non-free software on SMGL,
but we will never make the core system depend on an item of non-free
software."
There is definitely a reading of that which would remove otherwise free
software to z-rejected. Terms we need to define to make this all clear
enough include: support, core system, depend, non-free.
Attachment:
pgpqF2Ff90Vhm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?,
seth, 04/22/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?,
Eric Sandall, 04/22/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 04/23/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?, Mathieu L., 04/22/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?, Arwed von Merkatz, 04/23/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 04/24/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?,
seth, 04/25/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 04/25/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 04/25/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?,
seth, 04/26/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?, Arwed von Merkatz, 04/26/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 04/25/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?,
seth, 04/25/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?,
Eric Sandall, 04/22/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.