sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] project organization
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:15:39 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
> On Apr 17, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) [jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org] wrote:
>> I want to give some time for discussion on this, then depending on how it's
>> received I'll suggest it move forward based on the process it defines
>> itself: a motion, hopefully a second, and then a vote by the existing
>> Project and Team Leads. Whether it passes or fails, the non-Lead
>> developers would then have the option to veto the Lead vote. This is a
>> major change in some ways, so we should know there's agreement before we
>> use it or decide to drop it, and that process seems at least a decent way
>> to determine that.
>
> Well it seems to have been received pretty well, so I'm going to go ahead
> and move that we adopt the attached documents. These have been updated
> with the changes mentioned earlier in the thread.
>
> If someone seconds these I ask that the PL call for a vote from the TLs,
> and allow a veto motion/vote as described in these docs if someone moves
> for it after the initial vote, regardless of the outcome.
>
>
I think this re-org is a good idea, and I'll second it.
- --
David Kowis
ISO Team Lead - www.sourcemage.org
SourceMage GNU/Linux
Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to
find easier ways to do something.
- Robert Heinlein
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
- Arthur C. Clarke
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)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=JOM/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] project organization
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] project organization,
Robin Cook, 04/17/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] project organization, Seth Woolley, 04/17/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] project organization,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 04/17/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] project organization, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 04/17/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] project organization,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 04/18/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] project organization,
Eric Sandall, 04/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] project organization, Seth Woolley, 04/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] project organization, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 04/18/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] project organization,
Eric Sandall, 04/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] project organization, Eric Sandall, 04/22/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] project organization,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 04/25/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] project organization, David Kowis, 04/25/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] project organization,
Robin Cook, 04/17/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.