Public SourceMage Discussion List

["Mathieu L." <lejatorn AT smgl.homelinux.net>]

Good idea, I'm all for a java grimoire.
just my 2 cents.

Cheers,
Mathieu.

On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 02:16:50PM -0700, seth AT swoolley.homeip.net wrote:
> I've done a first round through the grimoire and a lot of spells were 
> skipped due to brokenness, so I expect a re-run will find even more 
> issues.  Through the weekend I will triage the rest of the bugs filed, 
> but I have one question to ask of everybody:
> 
> Should the spells that depend on z-rejected spells be moved until they 
> can have that restriction lifted?
> 
> There are spells that depend on a z-rejected spell that aren't rejected 
> because they could conceivably be run on code that wasn't rejected if we 
> had a spell for it and got it to work with it.  I'm talking mostly about 
> anything we have that's java-based.  I'm inclined just to say that java 
> should be its own grimoire (sequestered) until we can get the spells to 
> actually build/run in gcj or some other java compiler/runtime.  Thus 
> they're provisionally rejected, in a way since they can't be built with 
> our system without a rejected spell.
> 
> Seth
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss