sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
[SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?
- From: seth AT swoolley.homeip.net
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?
- Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 14:16:50 -0700
I've done a first round through the grimoire and a lot of spells were
skipped due to brokenness, so I expect a re-run will find even more
issues. Through the weekend I will triage the rest of the bugs filed,
but I have one question to ask of everybody:
Should the spells that depend on z-rejected spells be moved until they
can have that restriction lifted?
There are spells that depend on a z-rejected spell that aren't rejected
because they could conceivably be run on code that wasn't rejected if we
had a spell for it and got it to work with it. I'm talking mostly about
anything we have that's java-based. I'm inclined just to say that java
should be its own grimoire (sequestered) until we can get the spells to
actually build/run in gcj or some other java compiler/runtime. Thus
they're provisionally rejected, in a way since they can't be built with
our system without a rejected spell.
Seth
-
[SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?,
seth, 04/22/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?,
Eric Sandall, 04/22/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 04/23/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?, Mathieu L., 04/22/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?, Arwed von Merkatz, 04/23/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 04/24/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?,
seth, 04/25/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 04/25/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 04/25/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?,
seth, 04/26/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?, Arwed von Merkatz, 04/26/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 04/25/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?,
seth, 04/25/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] prometheus done -- plus, should we sequester/reject java spells?,
Eric Sandall, 04/22/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.