sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: "Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] State of x86_64
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:09:23 -0800 (PST)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
<snip>
As the total lack of testing the ppc ISOs are getting shows (The first
person to run through a total install with them was a new user), making not-
so-common architectures work is often quite hard simply because "you have no
clue if the thing actually works".
It seems to me that we have quite a few more people actively asking
about/using/patching x86_64 than ppc, but maybe the ppc people are the
silent majority.
To me, the reason PPC is higher than x86_64 is that we've supported
PPC for years now and I don't want to 'regress' by dropping support
for our users on that platform (who may just not be on the lists, IRC,
or are quiet). Our LUG has two PPC boxes (OldWorld), but David Brown
and I haven't had much time to play with them.
- -sandalle
- --
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDjgb2HXt9dKjv3WERAuddAKCwomWsjl05rUep1wZqVBT0+4lvHwCfcsQe
4VxekqYu+Et2FLLANw0LJXM=
=G/Ba
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] State of x64,
Jaanus Heeringson, 11/29/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] State of x64,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/29/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] State of x86_64,
Karsten Behrmann, 11/30/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] State of x86_64,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/30/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] State of x86_64, David Kowis, 11/30/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] State of x86_64,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 11/30/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] State of x86_64,
Eric Sandall, 11/30/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] State of x86_64, Andrew, 11/30/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] State of x86_64,
Eric Sandall, 11/30/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] State of x86_64,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/30/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] State of x86_64,
Karsten Behrmann, 11/30/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
[SM-Discuss] State of x64,
Janus Heeringson, 11/30/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] State of x64, Unet, 11/30/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] State of x64,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/29/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.