Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Karsten Behrmann <BearPerson AT gmx.net>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] i386 ISO
  • Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:46:36 +0100

> This would mean that we have to either not use nptl on the ISO or not
> support
> i386 anymore. Does anyone still want an i386 ISO?
> Of course, we can always (and probably still should) offer a seperate ISO
> for 2.4 (linuxthreads, i386) and 2.6 (nptl, i486).

So, am I right in assuming that popular consent wants both of the following:
A 2.6 ISO with non-nptl glibc
A 2.4 ISO with non-nptl glibc
Both still i386.

By the way, do we need seperate build systems for the 2.4 and the 2.6?
Or do we only need to package 2 or three spells differently for the two ISOs?

So Far,
Karsten

p.s.: I did make a non-nptl chroot system on my nptl box, which was a hell
of a lot of work and tweaking. (spell and sorcery modifications)

Attachment: pgplYlqJJkXSh.pgp
Description: PGP signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page