sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Variable naming for sorcery variables (WAS: random y and n files?)
- From: Jason Flatt <jason AT flattfamily.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Variable naming for sorcery variables (WAS: random y and n files?)
- Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 12:35:08 -0700
On Thursday 16 September 2004 12:23 pm, evraire AT tuwg.com wrote:
>
> To me, this sounds like trouble waiting to happen. As sorcery becomes
> more and more complex and more and more sorcery variables get defined, this
> problem will only become worse. I realize changing all the internal
> sorcery variables to a new nomenclature is a Big Deal(TM), but I think it's
> something we should strive for in the long run. To begin with, a
> nomenclature for internal sorcery variable names could be chosen and all
> new variables created can follow this nomenclature. Then, over time, we
> can convert the remaining variables to the new nomenclature.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Jonathan Evraire
> evraire at tuwg.com
I think I see a volunteer.
--
Jason Flatt (jason @ flattfamily . com)
Father of five (http://www.flattfamily.com/)
Linux user (http://www.sourcemage.org/)
IRC Nick: Oadae Channels: #sourcemage, #lvlug Server: irc.freenode.net
-
[SM-Discuss] Variable naming for sorcery variables (WAS: random y and n files?),
evraire, 09/16/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Variable naming for sorcery variables (WAS: random y and n files?), Jason Flatt, 09/16/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Variable naming for sorcery variables (WAS: random y and n files?), Andrew, 09/16/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.