Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Marketing SMGL: Competitors and differences? Help needed

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Andrew "ruskie" Levstik <ruskie AT mages.ath.cx>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Marketing SMGL: Competitors and differences? Help needed
  • Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 02:04:25 +0200

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 01:34:05 +0200
Jaanus Heeringson <jaanus AT heeringson.com> wrote:

> So I'm at it again, burning the midnight oil.
>
> I have recently read a lot of different articles about Linux in general
> to try and get a grip on the "feel" out there, and this is some things i
> found out:
>
> 1. There is a confusion about choise of distro. At least more than there
> was a few years ago, mostly due to the big ones starting to charge for
> updates etc. People change distros often and simply can't make up their
> minds. This is good for us, and we should take advantage of it.
> 2. Gentoo is big. It is almost allways mentioned alongside the other
> large commercial distros. This is good since more people are interested
> in sourcebased distros, and bad because we have a lot of work to do if
> we want to make ourselves heard next to them.
> 3. A lot of the intermediate users are very tired of choise. They simply
> don't want to research at every corner to install the appropriate stuff
> (which MTA, DNS etc) and are asking for a "preferred setup". This maby
> don't concern us yet, but it might in the future.
>
> I'm a bit interested in gentoo and how it differentiates from SMGL. I
> have read in on it a bit, but don't currently have time to install it
> now. What I have found so far does not seem very impressive, at least
> not when it comes to the base system. This of cause is not enough, so I
> need more input reguarding this issue. I'm sure there are a lot of you
> out there that try Gentoo now and then, so could you please describe
> your view of the differences between Gentoo and SMGL? What's good & bad?
> What are the major differences?
>
> My gut feeling is that in order to get some attention we will have to
> compete with Gentoo to get it, and since they actually are a for profit
> company, it will be quite a task. In my opinion we need to find a couple
> of point on how we differentiate us from Gentoo in a good way.
>
> --
> MVH
>
> Jaanus Heeringson
>
> Underwerks Design
> Ålegådsgatan 424
> 43150 Mölndal
> Sweden
>
> Mobile: +46 709 492609
> Phone: +46 31 402980
>
> http://www.underwerks.com
> mail: jaanus AT heeringson.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss

Hmm ok the closest I came to gentoo was using e-merde(no joke)
which is a slackware version of portage...

It's a bloaty thing... takes ages to update... not to mention I didn't
really get it to compile anything properly...

Just what I know...

ruskie

- --
For all the knowledge...
I will prevail...
If I fail nothing is left...
All is lost...
Never to be seen again...
Nevermore...

- --

Key ID = 32FE2034
Key fingerprint = EF36 041B E2A5 4E6F 7B3E 6B45 C0F2 E234 32FE 2034

- --

- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GAT d? s+:+++ a? C++++>$ UL+++ P L+++ E---- W+ N+ o? K? !w O+ !M
V PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t+++ 5+++ !X R++ tv++ b+++ DI? !D G e h! !r !y+
- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAjFIJwPLiNDL+IDQRAvZ8AJ9BLSIGWIsi/llOVEvt7cTDsziCmwCgnbEw
0A9U1y6c4lzyLGo+tTevkCw=
=HN52
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page