Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>]

On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 08:32:41PM +0200, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 11:22:45AM -0700, Andrew wrote:
> > > 
> > > I think it would be nice to have that in sorcery, with one additional
> > > requirement: it has to be possible to overwrite it from a spell, i.e.
> > > set some variable in a spell DETAILS that tells sorcery not to use the
> > > section function overrides.
> > > 
> > 
> > If you give me a name for the file and the variable to turn sourcing of
> > the file off I'll add it to sorcery for testing/using.
> > 
> > -Andrew
>  
> How about FUNCTIONS for the file and USE_DEFAULT_FUNCTIONS=on for the
> setting in DETAILS?
> 
So if USE_DEFAULT_FUNCTIONS is on then sorcery won't look in FUNCTIONS.
Should the default value of USE_DEFAULT_FUNCTIONS be off (look in
FUNCTIONS).

-Andrew

-- 
__________________________________________________________________________
|Andrew D. Stitt                           | astitt at sourcemage.org    |
|irc: afrayedknot                          | afrayedknot at t.armory.com |
|aim: thefrayedknot or iteratorplusplus    |                             |
|Sorcery Team Lead, Porting Team Lead      |                             |
|Grimoire Guru ham/smgl                    | ftp://t.armory.com          |
|Author and Maintainer of Prometheus       |                             |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------