sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO
- Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 01:05:50 +1000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 15:21, Craig Van Tassle wrote:
> What about an option to change the default system editor upon install of
> Elvix, VIM, Emacs, nano, or pico?
> I know we are talking about the ISO here.. and obviousaly EMACS is way to
> big to be on there in all its glory. :D
> As for an install I know the major user base for SMGL is linux compitant
> but Im also thinking about when we start getting users who know very little
> about linux and how to set it up?
> Sorry just jabbing here about a couple of ideas.
I am only talking about the ISO.
AS for new users, we can only make sure all our work uses safe/sane defaults,
it is still expected that the user either have linux/unix experience or be
savvy and prepared to learn. I won't recommend SMGL to a linux virgin (unless
I am setting it up for them) and I don't think we should cater for the lowest
common denominator. A minimum of knowledge is expected, or at least a
willingness to learn. Windows-style mindless point and click configuration is
not my goal.
If a user wants a system completely configured for them, doesn't want to use
common tools/utilities and doesn't want any control over its configuration
then they should install Fedora or Suse.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAbYFO8fSufZR6424RAkTyAJ4sTzrgsCJ7P7TWHvWAFhhB4wNh7gCdESTL
fcyAmOprVxRLCxpdnfcvpwk=
=plKi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Robert Helgesson, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Seth Alan Woolley, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Casey Harkins, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Craig Van Tassle, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Jason Flatt, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Derek Moyes, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Arwed von Merkatz, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Jose Bernardo Silva, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Vladimír Marek, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Mads Laursen, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Robert Helgesson, 04/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.