sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO
- Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 15:04:19 +1000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 15:05, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Quoting Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>:
> > On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 05:38, Robert Helgesson wrote:
> > > Elvis should stay. I believe most people cast VIM after the install if
> > > they like the VI interface but people also have different preferences
> > > on how to set it up so you'll have to do a cast -r -c vim regardless.
> >
> > Elvis will stay, but vim should be installable I think (no
> > optional_depends selected). but the installer doesn't install any
> > $SPELL_CONFIG files to /etc/sorcery/local/depends/* any more, so the
> > first sorcery rebuild will ask the user how they want it configured.
>
> Ahh, I like that setup. ;)
>
> -sandalle
looking back over this thread, you and I should really shutup and let some
others do the talking :)
Seriously, thanks for the feedback.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAbPRT8fSufZR6424RAgLVAJ9Z5fwOkEfxsK9I+AyqD/5nLFiP5QCeP6K9
ieQT3kIMaylHjgxNGwLMtCE=
=8wmA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Geoffrey Derber, 04/05/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/05/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Geoffrey Derber, 04/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
VladimĂr Marek, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Robert Helgesson, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Seth Alan Woolley, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Casey Harkins, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Craig Van Tassle, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Jason Flatt, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Derek Moyes, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Robert Helgesson, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/05/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.