sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 21:03:56 -0800
Quoting Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>:
> On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:23, Eric Sandall wrote:
> > Quoting evraire AT tuwg.com:
> > > > Do people use elvis or do they change to vim after install ?
> > > > should elvis stay and vim be added to the list of editors ?
> > >
> > > I personally use vim over elvis on anything but the most basic files,
> > > for which nano suits my purposes. So my vote is to supplant elvis with
> > > vim :)
> >
> > For all that you'll need vim for at that stage, you can use elvis, which
> > saves about 1.8Mb of space (by not using vim).
> >
> > -sandalle
>
> actually about 5 or 6 MB when you look at the data files vim puts
> in /usr/share
>
> I think from reading all this elvis should stay in the iso_root, jed and
> slang
> can be removed from iso_root but still selectable as editor from menu and
> installed automatically, and vim should be added as editor to the menu and
> installed automatically, but aliased/changed to elvis for usage within the
> installer.
>
> Does that sound like a good compromise ?
Sounds good to me.
> And if jed is removed from iso_root, should it be aliased/changed to nano or
>
> elvis ?
Duh! elvis. ;)
-sandalle
--
PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/E/IT$ d-- s++:+>: a-- C++(+++) BL++++VIS>$ P+(++) L+++ E-(---) W++ N+@ o?
K? w++++>-- O M-@ V-- PS+(+++) PE(-) Y++(+) PGP++(+) t+() 5++ X(+) R+(++)
tv(--)b++(+++) DI+@ D++(+++) G>+++ e>+++ h---(++) r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Arwed von Merkatz, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Jose Bernardo Silva, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
VladimĂr Marek, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Mads Laursen, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Casey Harkins, 04/01/2004
-
RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
evraire, 04/01/2004
-
RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Robert Helgesson, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Ricardo Izquierdo, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Ladislav Hagara, 04/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/06/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.