sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO
- Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 14:29:07 +1000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:23, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Quoting evraire AT tuwg.com:
> > > Do people use elvis or do they change to vim after install ?
> > > should elvis stay and vim be added to the list of editors ?
> >
> > I personally use vim over elvis on anything but the most basic files,
> > for which nano suits my purposes. So my vote is to supplant elvis with
> > vim :)
>
> For all that you'll need vim for at that stage, you can use elvis, which
> saves about 1.8Mb of space (by not using vim).
>
> -sandalle
actually about 5 or 6 MB when you look at the data files vim puts
in /usr/share
I think from reading all this elvis should stay in the iso_root, jed and
slang
can be removed from iso_root but still selectable as editor from menu and
installed automatically, and vim should be added as editor to the menu and
installed automatically, but aliased/changed to elvis for usage within the
installer.
Does that sound like a good compromise ?
And if jed is removed from iso_root, should it be aliased/changed to nano or
elvis ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAbOwT8fSufZR6424RAlK1AJ9SXWsfR/UfCjSbhCJyTEodGH5YwQCfS6tw
iysMvYR/RNfuD2y7EpO1Xr8=
=w8Uf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Derek Moyes, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Arwed von Merkatz, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Jose Bernardo Silva, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
VladimĂr Marek, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Mads Laursen, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Casey Harkins, 04/01/2004
-
RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
evraire, 04/01/2004
-
RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Robert Helgesson, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Ricardo Izquierdo, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Ladislav Hagara, 04/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/06/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.