sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 15:00:32 -0800
Quoting Robert Helgesson <rycee AT home.se>:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 00:35:19 +1000, Hamish Greig wrote:
> > optional for the new system or in the iso_root to use during install and
> > during rescue ?
> > Is elvis no good ? I don't use either so have no opinion.
>
> Elvis is fine, perhaps not for serious coding but I use it exclusively
> on my server and it's very nice for editing config files and such.
This is just for the initial install, after that you can put on whatever you
want.
> > Do people use elvis or do they change to vim after install ?
> > should elvis stay and vim be added to the list of editors ?
>
> Elvis should stay. I believe most people cast VIM after the install if
> they like the VI interface but people also have different preferences on
> how to set it up so you'll have to do a cast -r -c vim regardless.
Yep, vim is one of the first I do as well.
> > I would be fine with only nano in the iso_root but respect others wishes
> > to
>
> > not use it, and if jed and elvis aren't representative of what the
> > majority
>
> > is using now then the majority's choice should be added (at least for
> install
> > and for iso_root too if wanted)
>
> Personally I think removing jed from the ISO would be nice since then
> the slang library also can be removed. I don't know how many use Jed
> though. Perhaps replace it with uemacs?
Heh, I forgot about slang, so there's another reason to remove jed. I see we
have one user of jed so far, but he wouldn't mind it being removed if he's the
only one. ;)
> > For everything I have built caches for I have answered no to the
> > optional_depends (to simplify checking depends during install), would vim
> > built without any optional_depends turned on be ok or not ?
>
> For my purposes it wouldn't suffice and I suspect the setups for vim are
> quite diverse among it's smgl users. I feel that keeping elvis as the
> VI-like option is a good compromise.
elvis is vi-like enough to suite my needs during install.
-sandalle
--
PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/E/IT$ d-- s++:+>: a-- C++(+++) BL++++VIS>$ P+(++) L+++ E-(---) W++ N+@ o?
K? w++++>-- O M-@ V-- PS+(+++) PE(-) Y++(+) PGP++(+) t+() 5++ X(+) R+(++)
tv(--)b++(+++) DI+@ D++(+++) G>+++ e>+++ h---(++) r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Geoffrey Derber, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Geoffrey Derber, 04/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Geoffrey Derber, 04/05/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/05/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Geoffrey Derber, 04/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Geoffrey Derber, 04/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
VladimĂr Marek, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Robert Helgesson, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Seth Alan Woolley, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Casey Harkins, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Craig Van Tassle, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Jason Flatt, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Robert Helgesson, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Geoffrey Derber, 04/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.