sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Vladimír Marek <vlmarek AT volny.cz>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 22:10:42 +0200
On Pá, dub 02, 2004 at 12:35:19 +1000, Hamish Greig wrote:
[blah]
vim
[blah]
> optional for the new system or in the iso_root to use during install and
> during rescue ?
> Is elvis no good ? I don't use either so have no opinion.
> Do people use elvis or do they change to vim after install ?
> should elvis stay and vim be added to the list of editors ?
I don't know elvis much, but I believe that for install and rescue it's
more than enough. But _I think_ that everyone who likes vi-like editing
installs vim as one of first things, I would replace elvis with vim
completely, since the only advantage it has is that it's a bit smaller
(afaik). 0.86M versus 2.29M
> I would be fine with only nano in the iso_root but respect others wishes to
> not use it, and if jed and elvis aren't representative of what the majority
> is using now then the majority's choice should be added (at least for
> install
> and for iso_root too if wanted)
Yes
> For everything I have built caches for I have answered no to the
> optional_depends (to simplify checking depends during install), would vim
> built without any optional_depends turned on be ok or not ?
Optional dependencies are only other languages which vim can interpret
then, personally I never saw script which would need them. So it's ok.
Theese are only my feelings ofcourse, don't wanna start editor flamewar
:)
--
neuron
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Casey Harkins, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Craig Van Tassle, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Jason Flatt, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Derek Moyes, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Arwed von Merkatz, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Jose Bernardo Silva, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Vladimír Marek, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Mads Laursen, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Casey Harkins, 04/01/2004
-
RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
evraire, 04/01/2004
-
RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Robert Helgesson, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.