sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 21:49:09 +0200
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 12:35:19AM +1000, Hamish Greig wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 19:26, Vladimír Marek wrote:
> > Personaly I would like to see vim there too, but I admit it is not
> > neccessary. But the ratio size/value is good, I think.
> >
> > On the other hand I never used rpmunpack.
> >
> > --
> > Neuron
> >
>
> optional for the new system or in the iso_root to use during install and
> during rescue ?
> Is elvis no good ? I don't use either so have no opinion.
>
> Do people use elvis or do they change to vim after install ?
> should elvis stay and vim be added to the list of editors ?
> I would be fine with only nano in the iso_root but respect others wishes to
> not use it, and if jed and elvis aren't representative of what the majority
> is using now then the majority's choice should be added (at least for
> install
> and for iso_root too if wanted)
I think including only nano in the iso_root is enough. As to elvis and
vim: here's the first things from my activity log when i installed:
20020202 dispel elvis 2.1_4 success
20020202 cast vim 6.0 success
:)
> For everything I have built caches for I have answered no to the
> optional_depends (to simplify checking depends during install), would vim
> built without any optional_depends turned on be ok or not ?
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Seth Alan Woolley, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Casey Harkins, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Craig Van Tassle, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Jason Flatt, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Derek Moyes, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Arwed von Merkatz, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Jose Bernardo Silva, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Vladimír Marek, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Mads Laursen, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Casey Harkins, 04/01/2004
-
RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
evraire, 04/01/2004
-
RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.