sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 11:45:42 -0800
Quoting Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>:
> optional for the new system or in the iso_root to use during install and
> during rescue ?
> Is elvis no good ? I don't use either so have no opinion.
>
> Do people use elvis or do they change to vim after install ?
> should elvis stay and vim be added to the list of editors ?
> I would be fine with only nano in the iso_root but respect others wishes to
> not use it, and if jed and elvis aren't representative of what the majority
> is using now then the majority's choice should be added (at least for
> install
>
> and for iso_root too if wanted)
> For everything I have built caches for I have answered no to the
> optional_depends (to simplify checking depends during install), would vim
> built without any optional_depends turned on be ok or not ?
I'd say leave elvis in, as it's a smaller clone of vi, but remove jed. I
always
install vim after an installation, but vim is bigger (IIRC) than elvis, and
elvis has (most of) the functionality of vim. I never touch nano unless I
absolutely have to.
-sandalle
--
PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/E/IT$ d-- s++:+>: a-- C++(+++) BL++++VIS>$ P+(++) L+++ E-(---) W++ N+@ o?
K? w++++>-- O M-@ V-- PS+(+++) PE(-) Y++(+) PGP++(+) t+() 5++ X(+) R+(++)
tv(--)b++(+++) DI+@ D++(+++) G>+++ e>+++ h---(++) r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Seth Alan Woolley, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Casey Harkins, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Craig Van Tassle, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Jason Flatt, 04/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Derek Moyes, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Arwed von Merkatz, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Jose Bernardo Silva, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
VladimĂr Marek, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Mads Laursen, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Casey Harkins, 04/01/2004
-
RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
evraire, 04/01/2004
- RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.