sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 16:25:29 +1000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 16:00, Geoffrey Derber wrote:
> Hamish Greig wrote:
> > Please take a look, let me know how you feel about the lists, the ones
> > marked (arguable), and if any other useful utilities etc should be added.
> >
> > must have spells:
> > ++++++++++++
>
> <snip>
>
> > cpio:2.5
> > rpmunpack:0
>
> This early on, is there anything that really needs those. Maybe we can
> bump those to a bit later on? Most of our stuff comes from tarballs.
they are included because sorcery uses them. I am not aware of any rpms that
we use but I don't have detailed knowledge of all 2500+ spells, and unlike
xdelta and PATCH, where xdelta was only looked for if PATCH was set, I
believe sorcery has integrated support for rpmunpack and cpio, so they should
probably stay.
> On a side note, would it be possible to modify the basesystem spell
> accordingly. Minimize the basesystem spell down to the 'must have' for
> required depends and optional_depends for the others?
Yes someone could do that.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAa7Xb8fSufZR6424RApgAAJ9l2Vh0dYkonfoKpMAhESj7MVaTLgCdHtXd
rLZ3CFoRdnQxcyPFdrLEtlA=
=8ku2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Geoffrey Derber, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Geoffrey Derber, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Jason Flatt, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Jason Flatt, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Jason Flatt, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Geoffrey Derber, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Geoffrey Derber, 04/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Geoffrey Derber, 04/05/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/05/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Geoffrey Derber, 04/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Geoffrey Derber, 04/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
VladimĂr Marek, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Robert Helgesson, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO, Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Robert Helgesson, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Hamish Greig, 04/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] requests for spells on ISO,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.