Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

permaculture - Re: [permaculture] Wikipedia's Permaculture Problems

permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: permaculture

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: webmaster@pfaf.org
  • To: permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [permaculture] Wikipedia's Permaculture Problems
  • Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 23:15:30 +0000

From: Rael Bassan <rael@ripco.com>
Subject: [permaculture] Wikipedia's Permaculture Problems

On skimming the wikipedia's permaculture article, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permaculture It was obvious that additional editing is needed.

To reduce edit war energy, perhaps the changes could be collectively burnished in a more open wiki, before submission to wikipedia.

I would not worry too much about edit wars, there been very little action on the page in ages. Also its probably better to engage with other editors on the talk page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Permaculture rather than compose a big edit offline.

At first glance, these sections drew my attention:

1) Permaculture design for ecologinomic (ecology-economic) ethics.
The horrid neologism "ecologinomic" is missing both quotes and definitions in dictionaries (Websters and the top two neologism dictionaries listed at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neologism which includes The Internalational Dictionary of Neologisms, http://www.neologisms.us/ curated by permaculturalist mIEKAL aND.)

Yes there is a lot of Odem/emery related info in the article. Mainly due to one editor Sholto Maud, who does not seem to be too active now. While some of this is relevant and interesting it is a bit on the side of POV/undue weight (there are WP guideline on this).

2) In the Critiques section they have:
Some critics have argued that permaculture is best suited to tropical, mediterranean or desert conditions, but isn't suitable for a cool temperate country such as the UK. [5]

The critiques section is mainly my work. Its important that we try to give a balanced view of the topic, its an encylopedia article, rather than an advocacy piece for permaculture. I added this section in response to a question on the talk page commenting on lack of critiques.


Strangely the reference [5 = http://www.resurgence.org/bookshelf/burnett0805.htm], which I added, did not support the claim. I think this critique is more of a critique of permaculture as a synonym for forest gardening.

This section could defiantly be improved, I didn't find much in the way of informed criticism of permaculture. A good critique section could strengthen the article and the concept as it shows that there has been an examination of any weaknesses, and as good permaculturalist we should be continuously be review our ideas (i.e do our SWOT analysis).


Which ignores the many UK usages that follow in the Contemporary examples section:

3) In the Contemporary examples section, they request:
Please wikify (format) this [North America] article or section as suggested in the Guide to layout and the Manual of Style

Basically this section could do with a complete revamp, written in an encyclopedic style with some of the more notable projects. The current content might be more appropriate in the links. Both Graham and I are UK based which probably explains the rather UK focus of much of the article.

So feel free to dive in.

Rich (Salix alba on wikipedia)

--
Plants for a Future: 7000 useful plants
Web: http://www.pfaf.org/
Post: 1 Lerryn View, Lerryn, Lostwithiel, Cornwall, PL22 0QJ
Tel: 01208 872 963
Email: webweaver@pfaf.org
PFAF electronic mailing list http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pfaf





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page