corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
[Corpus-Paul] The dating of Galatians with respect to I Corinthians
- From: Loren Rosson <rossoiii AT yahoo.com>
- To: Corpus-Paul <corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [Corpus-Paul] The dating of Galatians with respect to I Corinthians
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
List-members should check out Mark Goodacre's
excellent series on the the dating of Galatians with
respect to I Corinthians. It's certainly caused me to
rethink a few things about Pauline chronology. Mark
focuses on references to the collection and changes in
theological formula between the letters, which he sees
as comprehensible on the assumption that Galatians
post-dates I Corinthians.
http://ntgateway.com/weblog/2006/09/does-galatians-post-date-1-corinthians.html
http://ntgateway.com/weblog/2006/09/does-galatians-post-date-1-corinthians_17.html
http://ntgateway.com/weblog/2006/09/does-galatians-post-date-1-corinthians_19.html
See also Mark's post (bearing on Galatians' dating)
for why Gal 2:1-10 = Acts 15, and not Acts 11:27-30.
This one drew interesting comments, including one from
Ben Witherington.
http://ntgateway.com/weblog/2006/09/jerusalem-council-gal-21-10-acts-15.html
Finally, it's also worth checking out Richard Fellows'
guest-post on Stephen Carlson's blog for alternative
ideas about the dating of Galatians with respect to I
Corinthians.
http://www.hypotyposeis.org/weblog/2006/09/richard-fellows-on-dating-gal-and-1.html
Good discussions all around!
Loren Rosson III
Nashua NH
http://lorenrosson.blogspot.com/
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
[Corpus-Paul] The dating of Galatians with respect to I Corinthians,
Loren Rosson, 09/28/2006
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] The dating of Galatians with respect to I Corinthians, Richard Fellows, 09/29/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.