Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

corpus-paul - [Corpus-Paul] The dating of Galatians with respect to I Corinthians

corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Corpus-Paul

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Loren Rosson <rossoiii AT yahoo.com>
  • To: Corpus-Paul <corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: [Corpus-Paul] The dating of Galatians with respect to I Corinthians
  • Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:47:09 -0700 (PDT)

List-members should check out Mark Goodacre's
excellent series on the the dating of Galatians with
respect to I Corinthians. It's certainly caused me to
rethink a few things about Pauline chronology. Mark
focuses on references to the collection and changes in
theological formula between the letters, which he sees
as comprehensible on the assumption that Galatians
post-dates I Corinthians.

http://ntgateway.com/weblog/2006/09/does-galatians-post-date-1-corinthians.html


http://ntgateway.com/weblog/2006/09/does-galatians-post-date-1-corinthians_17.html

http://ntgateway.com/weblog/2006/09/does-galatians-post-date-1-corinthians_19.html

See also Mark's post (bearing on Galatians' dating)
for why Gal 2:1-10 = Acts 15, and not Acts 11:27-30.
This one drew interesting comments, including one from
Ben Witherington.

http://ntgateway.com/weblog/2006/09/jerusalem-council-gal-21-10-acts-15.html

Finally, it's also worth checking out Richard Fellows'
guest-post on Stephen Carlson's blog for alternative
ideas about the dating of Galatians with respect to I
Corinthians.

http://www.hypotyposeis.org/weblog/2006/09/richard-fellows-on-dating-gal-and-1.html

Good discussions all around!

Loren Rosson III
Nashua NH
http://lorenrosson.blogspot.com/

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page