Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

corpus-paul - Re: beginner's guide to 'new perspective' - some qns

corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Corpus-Paul

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Jeffrey B. Gibson" <jgibson000 AT mailhost.chi.ameritech.net>
  • To: Corpus-paul <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: beginner's guide to 'new perspective' - some qns
  • Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 19:15:21 -0500


Jonathan Ryder wrote:

> Dear C-P,
>
> Following my earlier request ...
>
> First, thanks to Jeffrey, Mark and Mike for their responses.
>
> I've just read some of Dunn's earlier article which is useful as it starts
> with
> Sanders, putting him in context, and then goes on to detail his own new
> take on Paul
> as a result. I now have some initial questions which I'd be grateful if
> C-Pers could
> comment on.
>
> Dunn characterises Sander's work (chiefly PPJ) as a new perspective on
> Judaism (as
> mentioned as the 'presupposition' of the NP by Mike Thompson) and that
> Sanders
> himself, and those initially responding to/running with Sanders, comes up
> with very
> much an old perspective picture of Paul. Before turning to Paul himself,
> has anyone
> seriously contested Sanders NP on Judaism (ie provided a real alternative),
> whether
> from within Pauline studies or wider afield or can we say this is an
> 'assured result'?
>
> Dunn proceeds with 'an exegesis and description of Paul's theology from this
> perspective'. Chiefly, he reassesses justification as (Jewish) covenant
> language -
> speaking of God's recognition/acknowledgement that someone is in the
> covenant rather
> than initiation or transfer terminology. Does Dunn hold the court here? or
> are there
> significant alternative understandings of justification, as used by Paul,
> whether by
> those who hold the new perspective or otherwise?
>

You'll probably want to have a look at the chapters "Good News for Israel" and
"Justification and the Church" in Tom Wright's _What Saint Paul Really Said_.

> I'd be grateful for any references (kept at 'beginners' level for a 'quick'
> grasp of
> the issues), particularly re the 2nd question. Also, has anyone responded
> directly to
> Dunn's exegesis of Gal 2:16 in that article?

Yes. See Heikki Raisanen, "Galatians 2:16 and Paul's Break with Judaism," NTS
31 (1985)
543-553.

Yours,

Jeffrey
--
Jeffrey B. Gibson
7423 N. Sheridan Road #2A
Chicago, Illinois 60626
e-mail jgibson000 AT ameritech.net






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page