corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: "John C. Hurd" <John.Hurd AT Squam.org>
- To: Corpus-paul <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Pseudonymity & 2 Thessalonians
- Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 21:06:00 -0400
Frank Hughes quotes me on the usual argument for the non authenticity of
2 Thessalonians as saying:
"Anything about 2 Thess. which is similar to 1 Thess. is counted as
evidence of "slavish copying"; anything which seems
dissimilar is taken as evidence of non authenticity."
And he counters:
"I'd say that the argument against the authenticity of 2 Thessalonians
is made from a combination of similarity and dissimilarity.
Notably, the similarity is mostly in chapters 1 and 3 of 2
Thessalonians. But there are significant differences. . . ."
Exactly my point. One cannot use the argument from similarity and the
argument from dissimilarity at the same time; the arguments cancel each
other.
Best wishes -- John Hurd
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:: John C. Hurd Internet: John.Hurd AT Squam.org
:: Professor Emeritus of New Testament
:: Trinity College in the University of Toronto
-
Pseudonymity & 2 Thessalonians,
John C. Hurd, 05/02/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Pseudonymity & 2 Thessalonians, yonder moynihan gillihan, 05/02/1999
- Re: Pseudonymity & 2 Thessalonians, Frank W. Hughes, 05/02/1999
- Re: Pseudonymity & 2 Thessalonians, Jim Hester, 05/02/1999
- Re: Pseudonymity & 2 Thessalonians, John C. Hurd, 05/02/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.