corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Corpus-Paul

List archive

Date of Galatians

From: "Paul Miller" <pm AT midsouth.rr.com>
To: "Corpus-paul" <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Subject: Date of Galatians
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 11:06:53 -0500

I am interested in getting some feedback from the list on the dating of
Galatians. Is the North Galatian theory still held by some or is the South
Galatian hypothesis accepted by all? On the relationship of the Jerusalem
visits in Galatians and Acts is Lightfoot's G2=A3 argument or Bruce's G2=A2
position considered the most cogent by list members?

G2=Gal. 2:1-10
A2=Acts 11:30 12:25
A3=Acts 15:2-29

Paul Miller
Memphis

Date of Galatians, Paul Miller, 05/02/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Date of Galatians, Jim Hester, 05/02/1999
- Re: Date of Galatians, Richard Fellows, 05/02/1999
- Re: Date of Galatians, Mark D. Nanos, 05/03/1999