Corpus-Paul

["Jeffrey B. Gibson" <jgibson000 AT mailhost.chi.ameritech.net>]

Lloyd Barre wrote:

> Dear List,
>
> I would like to know how list members are defining the Pauline corpus these 
> days.  What letters, if any, are regarded as Deutero-Pauline? and why?
>

As our archives already indicate, there is not a unified view on this matter 
among List members, though many, for reasons again noted in the archives,
would not accept the Pastorals or Ephesians as "genuine". You will also find 
debate about the authenticity of 2 Thessalonians and Colossians. Perhaps
it might be more helpful for all concerned to know if  there a particular 
reason you wish to have this question answered. Then members may speak to it
more directly. In the meantime, you may wish to consult the "Introductions to 
the NT" by Brown, Ehrman, Schnelle, Guthrie, and L.T. Johnson to get a
feel for the debate on these issues.

Yours,

Jeffrey Gibson
--
Jeffrey B. Gibson
7423 N. Sheridan Road #2A
Chicago, Illinois 60626
e-mail jgibson000 AT ameritech.net