Corpus-Paul

["Frank W. Hughes" <fwhughes AT sunbeach.net>]

Was just looking through Bob Kraft's comments about disputed / undisputed
Pauline letters.  I really am unaware that anybody currently disputes
the Pauline authorship of 1 Thessalonians, Philippians, or Philemon. 
There are those who want to make 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 an interpolation,
and there are a number of proposals about the partitioning of Philippians
(recently very clearly recounted by Raymond Brown in his Introduction
to the NT).  If memory serves me correctly, Baur's suggestion
that 1 Thessalonians was inauthentic was answered (I would even say refuted)
in the Tübingen School by Richard Adelbert Lipsius.  There have
been a number of people who want to reverse the sequence of 1 and 2 Thessalonians,
starting with Hugo Grotius in the 1620s and including Johannes Weiss and
most recently Charles Wanamaker in his NIGTC commentary.  But who
other than Baur ever suggested that 1 Thessalonians was pseudonymous?

All best wishes,
Frank W. Hughes
Codrington College
Barbados, West Indies