cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Pearl Jam trying to limit the time the license applies?
- From: rob AT robmyers.org
- To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Pearl Jam trying to limit the time the license applies?
- Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 11:57:18 +0100
Quoting Terry Hancock <hancock AT anansispaceworks.com>:
J.B. Nicholson-Owens wrote:
If the license is "perpetual (for the duration of the applicable
copyright)" what will happen on May 24, 2006?
Most likely, the copy currently on the website will be removed,
or else re-licensed.
Yup.
http://www.lessig.org/blog/archives/000774.shtml
From a you-can't-make-money-with-creative-commons-licenses point of view, this
creates a buzz, sends the clip a bit viral, and creates more demand for the pay
version (not everyone will have a friend with a CC'd copy).
There's also this, but they'll have to wait 35 years. :-) Search for "Section
203" at:
http://www.lessig.org/blog/archives/002903.shtml
- Rob.
-
[cc-licenses] Pearl Jam trying to limit the time the license applies?,
J.B. Nicholson-Owens, 05/23/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Pearl Jam trying to limit the time the licenseapplies?, James Sweet, 05/23/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Pearl Jam trying to limit the time the license applies?,
Terry Hancock, 05/23/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Pearl Jam trying to limit the time the license applies?, Greg London, 05/23/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Pearl Jam trying to limit the time the license applies?,
rob, 05/23/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Pearl Jam trying to limit the time the license applies?, Greg London, 05/23/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Pearl Jam trying to limit the time the license applies?, drew Roberts, 05/23/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.