cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: <website AT gogog.com>
- To: <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Getting to Version 3.0
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 07:04:22 -0700
"As you can see, there are several reasons to version to 3.0 but
unfortunately, one-way compatibility with the FDL will not be in the
grab-bag of 3.0 goodies - we're hoping to achieve that another way."
If I may ask, what is the strategy for FDL compatibility, assuming we have
no dual licensing provision in version 3.0?
Thanks,
James
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Founders as a module? was Re: Getting to Version 3.0
, (continued)
- Re: [cc-licenses] Founders as a module? was Re: Getting to Version 3.0, drew Roberts, 05/22/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Founders as a module? was Re: Getting to Version 3.0, rob, 05/22/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Founders as a module? was Re: Getting to Version 3.0, drew Roberts, 05/22/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Founders as a module? was Re: Getting to Version 3.0, Terry Hancock, 05/22/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Founders as a module? was Re: Getting to Version 3.0, drew Roberts, 05/22/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Founders as a module? was Re: Getting to Version 3.0, Terry Hancock, 05/22/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Founders as a module? was Re: Getting to Version 3.0, drew Roberts, 05/22/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Founders as a module? was Re: Getting to Version 3.0, Terry Hancock, 05/21/2006
- [cc-licenses] Sunset Module, was Re: Founders as a module? was Re: Getting to Version 3.0, Terry Hancock, 05/18/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.