cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Nelson Pavlosky <npavlos1 AT swarthmore.edu>
- To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: keeping CC-SA free
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 08:57:04 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hey folks,
I vaguely remember at some point in the past somebody said that in the
CC 2.0 licenses it would be possible to mix Share-alike content under
different licenses by using the most restrictive license of the lot? Is
this true? If so, if I want to release my work under a ShareAlike
license but I don't want more restricted work being created from mine,
is there any way I can stop it? Saying "you could still use the 1.0
license" isn't satisfactory because it would create unnecessary
confusion if the rest of the world moves on to 2.0, which it presumably
would if that's the default on the "choose license" page.
~Nelson~
http://nelson.freeculture.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAkk0dXQ/3nj2y54kRAst2AJ4qYK2i63CuBONTCAhrzmglxTAf2QCglcfc
hnabqi60wz1oWWdW7mA70d8=
=WkSr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
keeping CC-SA free,
Nelson Pavlosky, 04/30/2004
-
Re: keeping CC-SA free,
Evan Prodromou, 04/30/2004
-
Re: keeping CC-SA free,
Greg London, 04/30/2004
-
Re: keeping CC-SA free,
Wouter Vanden Hove, 04/30/2004
-
Re: keeping CC-SA free,
Greg London, 04/30/2004
-
Re: keeping CC-SA free,
Mike Linksvayer, 04/30/2004
- Re: keeping CC-SA free, Nelson Pavlosky, 04/30/2004
-
Re: keeping CC-SA free,
Mike Linksvayer, 04/30/2004
-
Re: keeping CC-SA free,
Greg London, 04/30/2004
-
Re: keeping CC-SA free,
Wouter Vanden Hove, 04/30/2004
-
Re: keeping CC-SA free,
Greg London, 04/30/2004
-
Re: keeping CC-SA free,
Evan Prodromou, 04/30/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.