[TypicalGirls] Riot Grrrl book
kbguntha at hotmail.com
Fri Sep 14 16:22:33 EDT 2007
i hope no one takes offense to the anne frank reference. i apologize if so.
i don't mean to take
a holocaust victim lightly in the least. i was just looking for a point of
reference with the personal becoming public.
sorry, wrote this quickly too. at work.. oops. :)
>From: "Kelsey Guntharp" <kbguntha at hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: "Typical Girls: Women in Punk/Post-Punk/Underground Music (Circa
>1975-1980s)" <typicalgirls at lists.ibiblio.org>
>To: typicalgirls at lists.ibiblio.org
>Subject: Re: [TypicalGirls] Riot Grrrl book
>Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:18:10 -0700
>I totally understand where you and Layla are coming from. I think that
>being there in the beginning of something that was blown up and out and
>under lends an attachment that would definitely lead to a desire for
>privacy and personal memories.
>On the other hand I also feel like there is no use in fighting the
>inevitable result of this technologically advanced uh, situation. All we
>can really do is try and be now. show love. play music...
>i think it's great that we have such a wide variety of "news" outlets
>available to us. personal, published, music, writing, art... even medical.
>it's amazing and inspiring. and maybe a bit scary on many levels... and
>yes, it seems like maybe people are getting caught up in the ephemera. but
>shit! this is the first time we can actually FIND some ephemera! and who
>knows what great directions this might take future generations. Man, i know
>this is a por comparison, but Anne Frank's Diary was meant for HER eyes
>only. but look what good it has done. especially with the last generations
>of living witnesses dying.
>anyway. i think the future of documentation is so interesting and valuable.
>and scary. did i say that already? but inevitable!
>>From: "Tobi Vail" <tobivail at gmail.com>
>>Reply-To: "Typical Girls: Women in Punk/Post-Punk/Underground Music (Circa
>> 1975-1980s)" <typicalgirls at lists.ibiblio.org>
>>To: "Typical Girls: Women in Punk/Post-Punk/Underground Music (Circa
>>1975-1980s)" <typicalgirls at lists.ibiblio.org>
>>Subject: Re: [TypicalGirls] Riot Grrrl book
>>Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:05:27 -0700
>>well,,,there is a difference in perspective....if you made something
>>when you were 18 with the intent of 5 people reading it, would you
>>want it on the internet when you are 38? not necsesarily...i'm not
>>opposed to having some of my old work out there, i'm intending to make
>>it available on my own terms, but i have no interest in making a
>>fanzine 'available for download'...to me, fanzines are all about
>>context....those zines were not made for everyone...they were made in
>>a community for a community and often that was a community of less
>>than 20 people...i don't find that any more elitist than going over to
>>someone's house for dinner rather than having a banquet. obviously the
>>conversations you have with your friends over dinner are going to be
>>different than a speech you'd give at an awards ceremony...sorry if
>>this is warped by my personal persepctive/neurosis, but there you have
>>it...i also love ephermal art and view fanzines in the same way...
>>the thing about saying that young people missed out because they were
>>young doesn't hold up because anyone can make a fanzine. those zines
>>aren't any better than anything anyone could make right now. that is
>>why the fanzine is a great art form. it's there for the taking...
>>time to get in the van! nice to see everyone in the bay area...hi layla!
>>ps there is actually an overabundance of academic writing on riot
>>grrl, but some of it is good, just search online or on jstor or
>>something like that and you'll get overwhelmed. it's not like people
>>haven't archived it and analyzed it to death already....what needs to
>>happen is another movement, not more documentation, well,,,,that's
>>more than my two cents, but there you have it
>>On 9/14/07, mike at appelstein.com <mike at appelstein.com> wrote:
>> > I understand what you're saying, and I definitely understand the
>> > tendency to look at the past through rose-colored glasses. But at the
>> > same time, why should latecomers miss out on inspiring
>> > art/music/writing just because they happened to be too young, or just
>> > otherwise occupied, the first time? I don't think there's anything
>> > wrong with exploring the past, especially if it helps inspire the
>> > future. Perhaps a balance of past and present works best.
>> > -Mike
>> > mike at appelstein.com
>> > http://djearlybird.blogspot.com
>> > http://www.youngmarblegiants.com
>> > Quoting Layla Gibbon <lpgibbon at yahoo.com>:
>> > > One of the things I like about punk culture is that it
>> > > is transient. It kind of annoys me that suddenly now
>> > > everyone is so reverent towards the ephemera, people
>> > > bidding on ebay for fanzines and demos that would have
>> > > disappeared in previous generations.
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > TypicalGirls mailing list
>> > TypicalGirls at lists.ibiblio.org
>> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/typicalgirls
>>TypicalGirls mailing list
>>TypicalGirls at lists.ibiblio.org
>Gear up for Halo® 3 with free downloads and an exclusive offer.
>TypicalGirls mailing list
>TypicalGirls at lists.ibiblio.org
Test your celebrity IQ. Play Red Carpet Reveal and earn great prizes!
More information about the TypicalGirls