PBS Frontline Special "Silent Spring Revisited"
Lawrence F. London, Jr.
london at sunsite.unc.edu
Wed Jun 3 00:24:08 EDT 1998
> --------------PBS PRESS RELEASE----------------------
> FOOLING WITH NATURE
> PBS airdate: Tuesday, June 2, 9 P.M., 60 minutes
> In recent years, lower IQ, reduced fertility, genital deformities, and
> abnormalities within the immune system have all been suspected of being
> linked to synthetic chemicals in the environment. Scientists have found
> growing evidence that these chemicals, stored in our bodies, could
> threaten human health. "You are now carrying at least 500 measurable
> chemicals in your body," says World Wildlife Fund scientist Theo
> Colborn. "They were never in anyone's body before the 1920s."
> In "Fooling with Nature," airing Tuesday, June 2, at 9 p.m., on PBS,
> FRONTLINE and the Center for Investigative Reporting explore an alarming
> new theory being debated within the scientific community that challenges
> governments and the multibillion dollar chemical industry. The program
> includes interviews with scientists, politicians, activists, and
> business officials, finding a variety of reactions to this theory. The
> theory, known as "the endocrine disruption hypothesis," was made
> prominent by the 1996 publication of Our Stolen Future, co-authored by
> "Reaction to Theo Colborn's book was amazing," former industry insider
> Dawn Forsythe tells FRONTLINE. Forsythe believes that endocrine
> disruption has shaken chemical industry executives more than any event
> since the publication of Rachel Carson's Silent Spring. "Everything is
> at stake for the industry on this one," she claims. "It was a day of
> reckoning that they didn't want to see, and everything depends on what
> they find out."
> The day of reckoning for the chemical industry may soon arrive. In a
> controversial move, applauded by many proponents of the endocrine
> disruption hypothesis and prompted by an alliance between Senator
> Alfonse D'Amato and Long Island breast cancer activists, Congress took
> action. Despite the uncertain health threat, it mandated that the U.S.
> Environmental Protection Agency develop a battery of screens and tests
> to detect endocrine disrupting chemicals by August 1998. Over 75,000
> manmade chemicals, some of which have never been tested for safety, will
> be put through these screens.
> "This is the first time since the passage of the Toxic Substances
> Control Act more than twenty years ago that Congress has spoken on the
> issue of testing of chemicals," says Lynn Goldman, assistant
> administrator of the EPA Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic
> Substances. Goldman calls it a "fundamental change to the kind of
> legislation we've had in the past."
> Not all scientists agree that humans are in danger. Toxicologist
> Stephen Safe has dubbed the endocrine disruption hypothesis "paparazzi
> science" in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine and wrote an
> editorial for the Wall Street Journal entitled "Another Enviro-Scare
> "Fooling with Nature" brings Safe to Florida to discuss the importance
> and relevance of animal research to human health with scientist Lou
> Guillette, a leading proponent of the hypothesis. Guillette found that
> male alligators born in contaminated lakes have abnormally small
> phalluses and strikingly low levels of the male sex hormone
> "Let's not look at alligators," Safe says. "We've got human data...I
> wouldn't say there's not a problem, but I think the evidence does not
> show a parallel between what's happening to the alligators [in this]
> contaminated lake and humans." FRONTLINE explores Safe's criticisms of
> the endocrine disruption hypothesis and the weakness in the human data,
> as well as the controversy over Safe's research funding from the
> chemical industry.
> "There has been so much hype about endocrine disruption that it makes it
> difficult to carry on reasonable scientific discourse on the topic,"
> says Linda Birnbaum, associate director for health at the EPA's labs in
> North Carolina. "With endocrine disruption, not only will different
> scientists interpret the same evidence differently, they will campaign
> for their point of view in the public arena," says producer Doug
> Great Lakes scientist Jim Ludwig disagrees with Safe. "We don't have to
> prove the general case that endocrine disruption is a health threat," he
> says. "DES did that for us absolutely clearly, cleanly, no questions
> asked. That was a really nasty experience." The synthetic hormone
> diethylstilbestrol (DES), prescribed to pregnant women from the 1940s to
> the 1970s, caused severe reproductive abnormalities in their exposed
> Some scientists speculate that there is indeed "another DES" wreaking
> havoc in our environment. Hormone-related diseases like breast cancer,
> prostate cancer, and testicular cancer are on the rise. Controversial
> reports of a fifty percent drop in human sperm counts have grabbed
> headlines worldwide, and a condition called hypospadias (a malformation
> of the penis) appears to be increasing in baby boys.
> Of great concern are potential effects on the brain. "Fooling with
> Nature" explores the research of Joe and Sandra Jacobson, who found a
> permanent IQ deficit of up to six points in children exposed to
> environmental pollutants through their mothers' diet of fish from the
> Great Lakes, although they cannot say if endocrine disruption is the
> cause. But the threat remains. "Once the potential, the IQ potential,
> is shaved off a child, you can't put it back in," says Ludwig. "That's
> the key to this. That's why endocrine disruption is so important to
> "Fooling with Nature" is a co-production of FRONTLINE and the Center For
> Investigative Reporting. The film is produced by Doug Hamilton and is
> directed and edited by Michael Chandler. The executive producer for the
> Center for Investigative Reporting is Dan Noyes. Sharon Tiller is the
> senior producer for FRONTLINE.
> FRONTLINE is produced by a consortium of public television stations:
> WGBH Boston, WTVS Detroit, WPBT Miami, WNET New York, KCTS Seattle.
> Funding for FRONTLINE is provided through the support of PBS viewers.
> Additional funding for "Fooling with Nature" is provided by the
> Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the Deer Creek Foundation, the Fred
> Gellert Family Foundation, the Streisand Foundation, and the Wallace
> Genetic Foundation.
> Access FRONTLINE ONLINE at www.pbs.org/frontline for :
> o special reports on breast cancer and the chemical link;
> chemicals in the environment; how hormones work;
> o an "Animal Gallery" with pictures and summaries of what's known
> about endocrine disruption in certain species;
> o the debate concerning the threat to humans;
> o an endocrine disruption quiz;
> o "pros and cons" on the controversy over industry-funded studies;
> o readings on the theory of endocrine disruption;
> o more of FRONTLINE's interviews with scientists and policy
> Press contacts:
> Jim Bracciale [jim-bracciale at wgbh.org]
> Rick Byrne [rick_byrne at wgbh.org]
> Chris Kelly [chris_kelly at wgbh.org]
> Press and PBS station inquiries: (617) 783-3500
> Viewer comments and inquiries: (617) 492-2777 X5355
> FRONTLINE XVI/June 1998
More information about the permaculture