robmyers at mac.com
Tue May 25 18:46:15 EDT 2004
On 25 May 2004, at 22:08, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> I was very pleased to see that ShareAlike seems to have been
> reasonably preserved.
My knee-jerk initial reaction:
more complex, no representation, lots of music, no relicensing when
deriving (yay!), more robust.
My more reflective reaction (from my weblog):
[The licenses] cover music and combining works much better than the
1.0 license, but miss the crucial "representation of authority to
contribute" clause that makes people think about whether they really
are allowed to release Star Wars as Open Content. This was too strict
in the original license, but is present in a milder form in several
other licenses, and should have been kept in a watered-down form IMHO.
If you are making music or want a good license that allows the kind of
cross-media explosion that Lawrence Lessig's "Free Culture" has seen,
this is the license for you. If you are concerned about preventing the
SCOs of this world attacking Free Culture, the Free Software
Foundation's procedures for handling contributions may provide a good
Congratulations to the CC team for getting these licenses out and for
robustly enabling cross-media Free Culture.
More information about the cc-licenses