holtzermann17 at gmail.com
Wed Dec 14 13:01:27 EST 2011
> It could be a little better
> described as to what constitutes a derivative work, and what doesn't,
> but for the vast majority of cases I think CC-BY-ND can fit the bill
> for what people are *mistakenly* licensing under CC-BY-NC-ND.
+1 and nice post as a whole.
As I said in the OP, that's how NC mostly functions anyway (and as a
chilling effect on re-use, period). So a concrete proposal would be
to move NC => "ND". I still wouldn't use the material but at least
things would be clear.
More information about the cc-community