[cc-community] Re: CC licenses and "moral rights"
email at greglondon.com
Fri Apr 1 16:12:45 EST 2005
Mike Linksvayer said:
> Greg London wrote:
>> And I'm fine that it's outside the scope of
>> this list, but that too is separate from
>> the validity of the main argument:
>> contributers to libre projects ought to have
>> a way to waive their moral rights, for the
>> good of the community and project as a whole.
> I probably agree.
> However, waiving moral rights is probably out of scope. AFAICT not
> being able to waive moral rights is central to the moral rights idea.
> Obtaining the right to waive moral rights would involve court and
> legislative battles. FLOSS and CC work within existing legal regimes,
> the latter explicitly.
> If moral rights really bug you perhaps you should start or work with an
> existing organization that does attempt to challenge and change laws. I
> note that immoralrights.org is available. :-)
Moral rights by themselves don't bug me.
It bugs me that they come with a religious
devotion that makes it impossible to for
its proponents to question even the possibility
of a world without moral rights as being
reputable, or for them to acknowledge that
the inherent design of moral rights
could even possibly be abused by an author.
More information about the cc-community