[b-hebrew] Reason in languages

K Randolph kwrandolph at gmail.com
Mon Dec 17 21:40:57 EST 2012


3. Since when are recorded sources ‘fiction’?

2. Then why do you appeal to reason?

1. Reason is useful to recognize evidence, but is not in itself evidence.

Karl W. Randolph.

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Isaac Fried <if at math.bu.edu> wrote:

> 1. Indeed, without reason there is no evidence.
>
> 2. I fully agree with you that "Reason works in math, not linguistics."
>
> 3. What you call "The evidence" is pure fiction.
>
> Isaac Fried, Boston University
>
> On Dec 17, 2012, at 7:07 PM, K Randolph wrote:
>
> Isaac:
>
> Reason is not evidence.
>
> Reason works in math, not linguistics.
>
> The evidence indicates that King David would be hard pressed to understand
> a single sentence in spoken modern Hebrew.
>
> Karl W. Randolph.
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Isaac Fried <if at math.bu.edu> wrote:
>
>> It totally stands to reason that king David spoke modern Hebrew (No
>> WAYIQTOLs) to wives and children.
>>
>> Isaac Fried, Boston University
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/b-hebrew/attachments/20121217/36fbeb65/attachment.html 


More information about the b-hebrew mailing list