kwrandolph at gmail.com
Thu Jun 3 13:03:07 EDT 2010
If you can’t even get people who agree with you that the Bible is not
historic to agree with your theories, how do you expect to get people who
believe that the Bible is accurate history to agree with you?
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 7:02 AM, <JimStinehart at aol.com> wrote:
> 1. You wrote: “Where was Ur of the Chaldeans?”
Yigal answered that quite well. I read years ago that the Ebla tablets also
listed Ur of the Chaldeans (K%DYM) as a separate place from Ur of the
> Jim Stinehart
> Evanston, Illinois
In order for your theory to stand, you need an early date for the Amarna
period, which contradicts both the Bible and the findings of archaeology,
and a late date for Abraham which is your way of saying that the Bible is
ahistorical, that it is but myth.
Karl W. Randolph.
More information about the b-hebrew