[b-hebrew] Wellhausen

Michael Abernathy michaelabernat9001 at sbcglobal.net
Wed Dec 26 15:48:04 EST 2007

Thank you for responding. You answered in part,
"But there are ways to prove it wrong. One can find a section
that is indisputably to be attributed to Source 1 (S1) and show that it is
dependent on a section that is indisputably to be attributed to a second

That answer sounds quite reasonable in theory but I specifically asked 
for an
objective test for a reason. It appears to me that the decision that any 
belongs to a specific source is subjective, open to the interpretation 
of the
reader.  In my mind the response from  some of the  others on this list  
the subjective nature of such determinations.

I am certain that this approach seems quite sensible to those who have been
trained in it. From my limited background DH seems to be more a matter 
of faith
than science, being impossible to prove and nearly impossible to disprove.
And while I suppose you must find it of some value, I am perplexed as to 
how a
theory which encourages the interpreter to divorce material from its 
context is a particular benefit to interpretation.
Once again, thank you for responding.
Michael Abernathy

More information about the b-hebrew mailing list