[b-hebrew] YHWH pronunciation
VadimCherny at mail.ru
Mon Aug 1 15:09:51 EDT 2005
RE: [b-hebrew] YHWH pronunciation> I am interested to know how you come about such a radical
theory. You must have more reason than a philosophical idea of a society.
Well, only "I, thou, he" could be pronounced Iao. The verb cannot.
Plural suffixes are construed similarly. Duality ai (later - plural e-ei-im) means "thou, I". Abstract plural -o (-ot) is -au, "thou, he." This makes sense: using 1s, the most personal relation, for duality, and 3ms, the remotest, for abstract plurality.
Suffixes are vowels only. Consonants are semantical devices, vowels - morphological. Suffix consonants change between nouns and verbs, but vowels persist. Suffix consonants (caf 2s nouns, tav 2s verbs) served perhaps to write down suffixes without matres lectionis, or perhaps to avoid post-tonic gemination in penultimates-stressed nouns. This is a separate topic.
YHWH cannot be a meaningful word, like the verb, since no one could possibly declare a well-attested verb a great secret with unknown pronunciation.
> How would you account for the forms YaH, YaHu/YaHo with your model?
he could be mater lectionis for 2ms suffix -a. Incidentally, he is also "supportive consonant" of 3ms -hu-au-o. Thus, yau=yhh=yh with mappiq.
yhu=yau with mater lectionis
yho=yao=yau with 3ms hu-o
> How would you account for the transliterations IABE, IAOUAI etc.?
Iabe is literal, not phonetic transliteration; waw-beta.
Iaouai is plural form of Iao, modeled upon plural Elokim.
> Are there any patterns ANE cultures that led you to this hypothesis?
Of course, Judaism is unique.
> Is there any internal evidence in the TaNaKH which supports your theory?
Depending on how you read it. Milgrom's interpretation, I believe, is supportive.
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
More information about the b-hebrew