[b-hebrew] chet bet lamed (nehemiah1:7)
leviny1 at mail.biu.ac.il
Wed Jun 23 02:04:09 EDT 2004
I once heard Prof. Yehuda Feliks lecture on how many "mistakes" the author
of the Song made in his understanding of nature. The way he put it,
"Solomon" was a great poet, but he was a city boy who really had no idea
what how vinyard worked.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Karl Randolph" <kwrandolph at email.com>
To: "Hebrew" <b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 11:17 PM
Subject: RE: [b-hebrew] Offend/dealt corruptly - chet bet lamed
> Dear Reinier:
> If I were a vitner, I would like to have foxes around. Foxes don't ruin
vineyards, but they do hunt and catch things like mice, rats, moles and
other things that do ruin vineyards. If I remember correctly, they even like
to eat caterpillars. Foxes are also small, so the only human crops they
threaten are newborn lambs and fowl.
> I see this verse calling for holding onto the little foxes connected to
(tied to) the vineyard as a way to protect the vineyard and help it
> Karl W. Randolph.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Reinier de Blois" <r.de.blois at solcon.nl>
> > Dear Karl,
> > > I just looked at your site and looked at all text examples
> > > where you have the meaning of corruption of destruction, and
> > > with the possible exception of one use in connections with a
> > > hapax legomai of uncertain meaning, none of the uses
> > > necessarily have a meaning connected with corruption. Some of
> > > the examples IMO actually work better with the "tied to" or
> > > "restricted" meanings than destruction or corruption meanings.
> > You make me curious. How would you handle Song of Songs 2:15: "Catch us
> > the foxes, the little foxes that ruin the vineyards."
> > Reinier
> Talk More, Pay Less with Net2Phone Direct(R), up to 1500 minutes free!
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org
More information about the b-hebrew