[b-hebrew] epexegetical imperfect

cmeadows3 at verizon.net cmeadows3 at verizon.net
Mon Dec 27 10:57:07 EST 2004

Merry Christmas all!

I have a question about the translation of the so-called "pluperfect".  In Genesis 2:19 some bible versions translate the wayyiqtol "wayyatser" as "had formed", giving it an epexegetical sense instead of translating it as a narrative wayyiqtol.  I know opinions vary on this particular verse.  My question is this:

Given that the English "God had formed" is used in the NIV, would it be possible to use "having formed"?  This seems to change things a bit, rendering a wayyiqtol (in apparent narrative) with an English participle (in a dependent clause).  Would this be an acceptable translation?  Wouldn't the author likely have used a participle if this was intended originally?  Thanx.

C Meadows
Marshall University
> From: Bill Rea <bsr15 at cantsl.it.canterbury.ac.nz>
> Date: 2004/12/21 Tue PM 04:43:50 CST
> To: b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org
> Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53:8 lamo
> Peter wrote:-
> >The semantics of the ShLM root in Hebrew are very varied ...
> [snip]
> >Older translations tried this by calling this sacrifice a "peace
> >offering", but scholars have realised that this is a misunderstanding,
> >and so this translation has now been abandoned.
> What do they consider it to be now?
> Thanks.
> Bill Rea, IT Services, Canterbury  University \_
> E-Mail bill.rea at canterbury.ac.nz              </   New
> Phone 64-3-364-2331, Fax  64-3-364-2332      /)  Zealand
> Unix Systems Administrator                  (/'
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew

More information about the b-hebrew mailing list