[b-hebrew] linguistics, was Re: Prov. 30:19

Karl Randolph kwrandolph at email.com
Mon Oct 13 17:32:25 EDT 2003


Touché  .   .   .   .   .  :-)

In other words, neither of us has enough data to convince the other.

I would amend that to an interview with a pre-Galut Babel Hebrew.

Karl W. Randolph.

Ps. I agree with Trevor that there is no good reason to continue the discussion at this time.


----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk at qaya.org>

> On 12/10/2003 08:32, Karl Randolph wrote:
> 
> >... (As for the early Scandinavian runic writing, did the early Vikings have only 16 phones in their speech, or did their 16 glyphs correspond to 16 phonemes? Only an interview with a surviving Viking can answer that.)
> >  
> >
> Or did they have many more than 16 phonemes but for some reason only use 
> 16 glyphs?
> 
> >It is my belief that Hebrew started out as a phonetic writing system, where each grapheme corresponded to a consonantal phone with a couple of exceptions where waw and yod sometimes indicated vowels, only later, as the language changed, added new phones and split one phoneme into two, were the graphemes adjusted by adding dots to show the new phonetic values. We see the same development in Arabic.
> >  
> >
> Does your belief correspond with historical reality? Only an interview 
> with a surviving Hebrew can answer that.
> 
> >Karl W. Randolph.
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Peter Kirk
> peter at qaya.org (personal)
> peterkirk at qaya.org (work)
> http://www.qaya.org/
> 
> 

-- 
__________________________________________________________
Sign-up for your own personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

CareerBuilder.com has over 400,000 jobs. Be smarter about your job search
http://corp.mail.com/careers




More information about the b-hebrew mailing list