jacksonpollock at earthlink.net
Sat Nov 15 15:31:38 EST 2003
On 11/15/03 11:57 AM, "Trevor Peterson" <06PETERSON at cua.edu> wrote:
> This is a
> lexical category, because it is a matter of how the word was derived in the
> past, not how a speaker would regularly generate it.
A "poststructuralist" might be temped to ask what difference it makes how a
word was derived in the past?
BTW, does anyone have a .pdf version of the following articles **including
embedded Hebrew fonts**?
TOWARDS A NEW DICTIONARY OF BIBLICAL HEBREW BASED ON SEMANTIC DOMAINS
Reinier de Blois
United Bible Societies
Woerden (Utr.), The Netherlands
A SEMANTIC DICTIONARY OF BIBLICAL HEBREW
by Reinier de Blois
AFRETCON BAGAMOYO 2002
I already have the MSWord docs.
More information about the b-hebrew